On June 17th 2015 the Court rejected the counterparties claims. Our client was summoned by her former business partner who wanted her to return to him a sum of ‘borrowed’ money. He stated that our client lent money from him to buy a horse. However, my client argued in front of the Court that she never borrowed any money from him and she bought the horse on his behalf.
The Court agreed with our client’s point of view. The counterparties’ claims were rejected and he was ordered to pay to our client all unpaid stabling costs etc. since our client was taking care of HIS horse.
In this procedure our client was represented by Mr. Schelstraete and Ms. Loeffen.
